LGBTQ+ issues

LBGTQ+

I am paternalistic toward LGBTQ people . I believe other non LGBTQ people should also use their hetero positions to advocate for LGBTQ rights while non LGBTQ politicians should use their position of power go help the LGBTQ community. Like someone who is at the top of a ladder reaching down to pull people stuck on the ladder up

I support some aspects of LGBTQ conservatism

I also support the Max Stirner inspired brand of Queer Anarchism . I support their notion of (and embracing) radical individualism that is influenced by individual philosophers like Max Stirner. In particular I support Queer Anarchists using Max Stirner’s non-systematic approach, radicalism and direct action. I like how queer anarchists organized and played a major role  in the WTO protests and anti-globalization movement. 

Queer paternalism and the Max Stirner inspired brand of Queer Anarchism are the pro Queer rights methods I like because as it seeks positive change for Queer people in the best ways

Personally , I feel that gay marriage (and supporting gay marriage) is not consistent with my values 

Legality wise, I yield to gay marriage being legal , I don’t fight against gay marriage and I don’t want gay marriage to stop being legal 

to gay marriage being legal , I don’t fight against gay marriage and I don’t want gay marriage to stop being legal 

My reason for yielding to gay marriage being legal (and for me not fighting against gay marriage and me not wanting gay marriage to stop being legal) is because in my heart of hearts, I FEEL that it should not matter if commitment is between a man snd woman, man and man or woman and woman. It’s not just about equality but also about commitment. Conservatism (which make up some of my political views) values the ties that bind us, that society is stronger when people make vows to each other and support each other. So in that weird way, gay marriage meshes with Conservatism thus why I have this view.

I am between being against (pragmatic conditionally) all of the 'anti gay' laws passed or that were attempted to be passed in various states since gay marriage was legalized and being against the the 'anti gay' laws that passed or that were attempted to be passed in various states since gay marriage was legalized that by those ‘anti lgbtq’ laws not being passed it doesn’t infringe on other peoples’ rights/supporting the ‘anti lgbtq laws that passed or that were attempted to passed in various states since gay marriage was legalized that if those ‘anti lgbtq’ laws weren’t passed other peoples rights would be infringed upon

I want civic, religious and common law marriage to be abolished for straight couples and gay couples and for Straight Handfasting and Gay Handfasting to be the only legal form of 'marriage' for straight couples and gay couples (ie if Civil Marriage, Common Law Marriage and Religious Marriage are all abolished and Handfasting replaces Civil Marriage, Common Law Marriage and Religious Marriage as the only legal form of 'marriage' for both straight couples and gay couples). The less officialness of the archaic concept of state sanctioned coupling the better

In the case of future real wedding after an unofficial wedding, unlike in existing Handfasting, Privatized Marriage would serve to be that possible future wedding instead of a Civil Marriage, Common Law Marriage or Religious Marriage. Moreover, the temporary officiated weddings under this Handfasting system would be Civil Unions as opposed to Civil Marriage, Common Law Marriage or Religious Marriage, which are the temporary officiated forms of existing Handfasted weddings. Maybe we should look into making this a reality

I believe that gays and gay couples should be allowed to become foster parents

I pragmatically believe unmarried heterosexuals and unmarried transgays (transgay to gay is what trans male is to male and trans female is to female it is different than gay and transgender) should be allowed to adopt children  But maybe in the not so distant future I will also says unmarried gays should also be allowed to adopt children too

Deep down inside, I think it should be as hard for gays and gay couples to adopt children now and in the future as it was in Utah and Mississippi in the early to mid 2000s decade. Milo said it best when he talked about Mayor Pete's adoption and how negative of an effect that was for him.  

Personally I support adoption being legal for straight couples and gay couples but only if gay couples allowed their closest friend(s), ex partners or spouses who were of the opposite sex of them to have a 'Full House' type relationship with the adopted child(ren) (like the relationship that Aunt Becky had with Danny's daughters on Full House for adopted children of homosexual couples or like the relationship that Uncle Joey and Uncle Jesse had with Danny’s daughters on an alternative history Full House where Danny died in 1987 and Pam raised their three daughters with help from Uncle Joey and Uncle Jesse for adopted children of lesbian couples). and only if straight couples allowed their closest friend(s), ex partners or spouses who were gender fluid, non binary, gender nonconforming, Intersex, Transgender to have a 'Full House' type relationship with their adopted child(ren) (like the relationship that Aunt Becky had with Danny's daughters on Full House, or like the relationship that Uncle Joey and Uncle Jesse had with Danny’s daughters on Full House), Otherwise, personally I am very non endorsive of straight couples and gay couples adopting children

Legality wise I am between supporting gay adoption (because I feel the more people willing to adopt children the better ,it is so hard to find parents to adopt children so gay willing to adopt children makes this easier, gay couples and gay single parents are the best parents to deal with children or teens who are gay) and me supporting a Murray Rothbard-Anarcho Capitalism form of state adoption for straight couples and gay couples to replace our current system of adoption (because I have a Murray Rothbard-ANcap streak in me somewhere) 

Seeing gays sell out and be parents is depressing. I always respected how gays were unique and didn't want to follow social norms, but gays having children means they are selling out and becoming hetero in all but a name.  

I am neutral on gay conversion therapy being legal. Many LGBTQ+ people don't want gay conversion therapy banned. However, some people note that gays should use Christian methods and or better self control to become straight instead. Hence why I am neutral

I am against Rick Perry's early 2010s anti gay laws

We need non id pol economic policies which indirectly remove workplace hierarchies which will naturally end workplace discrimination of LGBGT people. This means by phasing out Capitalism for non Capitalist socio economic systems etc. Workplace discrimination of LGBTQ people is bad to working class people of all stripes as any discrimination practices between demographic sections of the working class cause a very divisive practice hurting the development of working class consciousness , creating barriers to class unity to take away attention from class exploitation which bolsters the rich 

So by fighting indirectly ending LGBTQ discrimination via ending workplace hierarchies through the above socio economic shift, it can help all workers of all sexual orientations since without the distractions of anti LGBTQ bigotry, their attention would then shift to the evils of the rich corporate crony capitalists which would lead to the overthrow of those rich corporate crony capitalists, leading to the betterment of ALL people (i.e a fully functioning society), not just LGBTQ in all aspects. If you think this is a selfish motive (help LGBTQ) by doing something that appears woke (ending LGBTQ discrimination albeit indirectly), I won’t correct you.   

I am against gay acts being criminalized

If people want to criticize that in God’s eyes being gay is a sin, then they should take that up with God and 'try' to get God to be liberal on gay rights so I can be more of an ally of the gay movement

If I had a relative who was gay I would love them as much as I do now but I would be neutral to lean Christian Democratic on whether I would support them being gay

I am against kids in preschool and k-6 school being taught these type of things. That type of teaching has no place in preschool and elementary schools. I don't think I would complain at all if all lgbtq+ teaching is removed from k-12 schools except in very rare cases. I am not crazy about the aggressive push to promote LGBTQ in our schools

Personally, I am Eight Political Position lean Liberal Conservative on repealing Section 28 of the Local Government repeal Act 1988

Legality wise, I conditionally support repealing Section 28 of the Local Government repeal Act 1988 because I am an Anarcho Libertarian/Paternalistic and a supporter of some aspects of LGBTQ conservatism (on the condition that the government doesn’t groom people to be gay)

I am against Heterophobia

I am indifferent to mixed on the Straight Pride movement

A few of my friends from one of my former Christian groups has these this thought below in parenthesis and I can’t find a way to counter them:

“We pro traditional marriage/conservatives are the true 'gay rights activists' because we push for gays to live more divine, spiritually happier, and meaningly fulfilling lives and afterlives (by being straight) than they would live if they were gay. Liberals snd Progressives on on the hand, are the true 'anti gay' group since they push gays to live worse lives (by being gay) and worse afterlives (by being gay) than they would live if they were straight.”

I toxically sympathize with Heterosexists

I am against Lesbian Erasure.  It is wrong and Lesphobic for people to try to get Lesbians to transition to males or to become fluid. That is evil. Lesbians need to get more visibility within the LGBTQ movement, and be treated as equal to Homosexuals. There is nothing relatively wrong with women being Lesbians. Due to Lesbian Erasure being pushed by some Transgender activists, I feel the T should be dropped from LGBTQ as punishment for the Lesphobia in the Trans community until they treat Lesbians as equals to homosexuals 

Our schools should teach the three Rs not the LGBTQ+ .Kids can learn about LGBTQ+ easily online or through Hollywood, they don't need to learn it in school (except in sex ed and in college than its ok to be taught)

I am not an Anti Cissexist 

Personally and systematically, my views on Transgender rights match the Conservative Party UK’s views and policies on Transgender rights

Legality wise, I want Transgender people to get their rights but via the private sector instead of via the government and for Transgender people and Cisgender people to retain their rights via the private sector instead of via the government .  This means using private institutions instead of the government to give Transgender people their rights and to maintain the rights of Transgender people and Cisgender people and to give official recognition of the desired gender of Cisgender and Transgender people. This way the government stays out of the gender policing business.

I am against banning conversion therapy for transgender people due to Libertarian reasons

I am Liberal Conservative on whether I believe that gender dysphoria is a mental disorder (personality disorder) and should be called Gender Identity Disorder

There is nothing wrong or transphobic about a woman saying they are proud to be a woman. I fully support Adele's 2022 Brit Awards speech. Her speech was 100 percent positive and great.

Males have penises , females have breasts and vaginas. Mainstream science confirms this as does common sense. I doubt the evidence I need to change this view exists

Teachers shouldn't encourage students to be transgender. Their job is to teach not to convert kids into being transgender.

It is NOT transphobic for straight non transgender people to not want to date transgender people. Anyone who disagrees is a cisphobic bigot

I believe that transgender women should not be allowed to get cervical cancer screenings since they don't have that organ and that transgender men should be allowed to get cervical and breast cancer screenings (since not getting those tests can lead to them getting those diseases and those diseases are worse than so called gender dsyphobia)

I like how Transgender people stay true to their new genders and I have no issues with them showing the distinctiveness of their new gender even if that rubs some feminists the wrong way. Transgender people are evolving gender distinctiveness, they are not making gender distinctiveness toxic or over the top

I am against feminists weaponizing political correctness against Transgender people

I feel Polyarmy while very bad is less bad for transgender people and as such I believe in moderation for legalizing Polyarmy but only for Transgender people. I am fully against Polyarmy being legal except for maybe Transgender people and only moderately

I am against RuPaul's drag race allowing drag queens who had sex change surgery compete in their competitions and similar competitions. I also echo some of RuPaul's older views on transgender people that Peter Thiel would either be neutral on, lean not agree with,  or agree with

I have no issues with the UK banning kids under 16 from being transgender. I have more important things to worry about