Fiscal issues

 fiscal

I am a Social Democrat (including Luxemburgism), Social Marketist, Libertarian Middle Class Communist,  Libertarian Anarchist (including Egoist and Dark Mutualist), Distributist and Peronist

I support the Labour Party UK (One Nation Labour [which is real economic nationalism]/Third Way/soft left Social Democrat politicians and policies only/Patriotism/Communitarianism/Mutualism faction/Blue Labour/Friends of Israel sect)

Besides me supporting Labour Party UK soft left Social Democracy, I also support Portuguese Social Democratic Party Social Democracy and populist market economics 

My combined economic views can be described as One Nation Labour brand of Revolutionary Socialism (ymmv) and this can be seen throughout this blog

I want us to transition to a socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society (since I very often feel that the proper role for government is to provide national defense, a court system for civil disputes, a criminal justice system for acts of force and fraud, and little else) using either the worker path (Autonomy or Five Star Movement economy/New Libertarian (counter economics with a Libertarian conscious) economics) or the market path (Dark Mutualism and Egoism that uses Distributism as a safety net in the local needs sector or the modern sector, A.R State AE Eco Lib market that uses Social Markets/Social Credit as a safety net in the global exports sector or primitive sector) to achieve this

Worker path (Autonomy or Five Star Movement economy/New Libertarian (counter economics with a Libertarian conscious) economics) to our socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society:

Method 1: We get the government to implement a Five Star Movement type of economy (including markets which would include a green economy). 

After we do that, we fuse that Five Star movement type of economy with New Libertarian (counter economics with a Libertarian conscious) economics to undermine the State's moral authority and outright power until they have been so thoroughly undermined, revolutionary market anarchist legal and security enterprises would arise from underground and ultimately suppress government as a criminal activity (with taxation being treated as theft, war being treated as mass murder, etc). Basically using a Agorist-Syndicalist alliance

Method 2. (Autonomy): Revolutionary actions (like strikes) being organized responsibly by free workers rather than by bureaucratic union officials and organizations . This would prevent tragedies like the Haymarket massacre. I tend to be antipathetic to formal syndicalism, as I see it as reformist.

This would mean the working class would need to force changes to the organization of the capitalist system independent of the state, unions or political parties. 

These worker movements would be less concerned with party political organization than other Marxist movements (their fanatically patriotic desire for a future socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist /voluntary society would be of higher concern for them)

In fact these worker movements would not be welcoming to Marxist (without adjectives) workers who want to be part of this revolution at all because these worker movements need to be kept autonomous and free of a DotP . Thus Marxism (without adjectives) could threaten these movements

However, civic types of Marxists (i.e Marxists who have a high sense of patriotic and cultural responsibility for the welfare of less fortunate people including wage earners [by my definition] and who fight for their cause) should and would be welcomed in these workers’ movements as long as that patriotic and cultural responsible cause doesn’t threaten these worker movements 

Instead these workers would use self organized action that is outside of traditional organizational structures. It would be  "bottom-up" and draws attention to activities that everyday working class resistance to capitalism, like absenteeism, slow working, socialization in the workplace, sabotage, and other similar methods. There would be a conscious advance guard of this proletarian class movement nudging them along . The proletarian class should be as self reliant and self sufficient as possible to make this worker revolution succeed. Unclassy workers who leach off of others should not be part of this struggle

However this would not downplay the fact that class struggle is of central importance. In this revolution there would be class warfare against counter revolutionaries who are of a reactionary spirit 

I have a, broader definition of the working class than do other Marxists have. I count white collar (except corrupt white collar workers) and blue collar workers, students, the unemployed, homemakers, etc., as wage earners even though the latter are traditionally deprived of any form of union representation. 

Modern society's wealth is produced by unaccountable collective work. Only a little of this is redistributed to the workers in the form of wages. People forget the importance of feminism and the value of unpaid female labour to capitalist society. So the non traditionally viewed wage earners like students, the unemployed, homemakers, etc. might cut into the traditional worker class workers’ power and gains in this worker revolution subsequent socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society that follows it 

I feel that unpaid female workers like homemakers should get equal (equal as in ‘equal but more equal’) treatment, power and gains in this revolution and in the subsequent socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society that follows it than the working class (both male and female) and unpaid male workers and students get in this revolution and in the subsequent socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society that follows it. 

This worker revolution will make rid the notion that capitalism is an irrational system that can be made rational through planning. 

Instead, this worker revolution will have us assume the workers' viewpoint, and privilege their activity as the lever of this revolutionary passage. This alone can lead to a more socialistic society. 

Economics is entirely political. Economic relations are direct political relations of force that is between class subjects. It is inside the social worker’s economic category not in an alienated political form like the party, that should be the initiative for political change resides.

This would eventually then lead to our socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society and hopefully the owners would seize the means of production. When this happens,  no matter how big or small a job a worker would do, their work would be valued by the government and society (the wage system would be retained based on the amount of labor performed). 

There might be collective cooperative markets in this society. Some of the necessaries for production would be owned in common by labour groups and the free communes (these common-commune entities as a whole would be seen as individuals like corporations as a whole are currently seen as individuals in our society). The methods of retribution/ distribution of labour, communist or otherwise, would be settled by each group for itself.

In this socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society, the only privileged class will be children .  This socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society will have pre Capitalist elements to it

Market path market (Dark Mutualism, Egoism and Distributism [as a safety net] in either the local needs sector or the modern sector, A.R State AE Eco Lib and Social Markets/Social Credit [as a safety net] in either the global exports sector or in the primitive sector)

In the market path, we would use a dual economy implemented on this path. 

Dark Mutualism and Egoist economics would be geared either for local needs in a local needs sector or in the modern sector while the A.R State AE Eco Lib would be geared either toward the global export market or in the primitive sector. 

There probably would be two separate, autonomous ‘free markets’ : Dark Mutualism and Egoist econimics  (for the local needs sector or in the modern sector) and A.R State AE Eco Lib (for the global export market or in the primitive sector)

In this market path in the local needs sector or modern sector, it would use Dark Mutualism and Egoism in different parts of the local needs sector or modern sector . Here is some background on Dark Mutualism

In this market path, in the Egoist part of the local needs sector or modern sector in the market path, money would be issued for a limited period by constant value (neither inflation, nor deflation). There would be long term saving which would require investment in bonds or stocks. 

All land would be commonly owned or else the property of public institutions and can only be rented from the community or from government, respectively, not purchased in the Egoist part of the local needs sector or modern sector in the market path . They would also use Freihandel (free trade) system. 

Anarcho Syndicalists who use a non-systematic approach would help in creating and maintaining this society this Egoist economic system within this local needs sector or modern sector in this market path

Here is more about the Egoist economic system that would be used in the Egoist part of the local needs sector or modern sector in the market path

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, it would use Distributism as a social safety net for socioeconomic issues. This would mean , as a safety net, in the local needs sector or modern sector private banking would be dissolved in favor of Distributist types of financial cooperatives, mutuals (like credit unions), building societies, mutual banks and friendly societies.

There would be no or less profit-making basis in charging interest in this Distributist safety net in the local needs sector or modern sector 

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety net, there would be an abolishment of legal enforcement of interest-rate contracts (usury) issued by private banks. It would not entail nationalization but also would involve government involvement of some sort. This would also involve favoring the dissolution of other private financial intermediaries like insurance companies and industry funds.

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety net, the majority of the people would be able to earn a living without needing to rely the use of the property of other people to do so. 

As with farmers owning their own land and machinery, carpenters and plumbers owning their own tools etc. This cooperative approach would advance beyond this perspective to recognize that such property and equipment may be co-owned by local communities larger than a family, (i.e partners in a business)

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety set, there would either be direct or indirect distribution of the productive assets) (means of production) in some ideological circles which would include the redistribution of wealth , to a wide portion of society instead of concentrating it just in the hands of a minority of wealthy elites . 

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety set,  there might be a distributism-influenced social capitalism (also known as social market safety net as in the global exports sector or primitive sector part of this market path) in this safety net or a more socialist-oriented model like distributism-influenced libertarian socialism. Examples of these Distributism safety net methods of would include direct productive property redistribution, taxation of excessive ownership of property, and small-business subsidization

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety set, there would be strong antritrust laws and some sort of guild system. 

The existence of labor unions in this Distributism safety net would not constitute a realization of this facet of distributist safety net order, as labor unions are organized along class lines to promote class interests and class struggle.Guilds on the hand would mix class syndicates that would be composed of both employers and employees who would cooperate for mutual benefit, thereby promoting class collaboration. This doesn't mean that there would be no trade unions though.

In this market path in either the global exports sector or in the primitive sector, it would use a A.R State AE Eco Lib system (Ayn Rand state actually existing economic liberal market system) 

If we divide this dual economy on this market path by primitive sector economy and modern economy, the AE Eco Lib system would be used in the primitive sector, and it would follow this model, by using the A.R State AE Eco Lib system to drive the laborers from the primitive sector to the modern sector (that uses Mutualism as their economic system). This would create more development, since if we use this form of dual economy on this market path, we will need more development due to using a Mutualism economy for the modern sector

But growth in the primitive sector must not be negligible and its output should be sufficient to support the whole economy with food and raw materials.

A.R State AE Eco Lib fuses actually existing Ayn Rand economic liberalism with Ayn Rand state economic liberalism.

If there are issues using the above A.R State AE Eco Lib system in this market path in either the global export goods sector or primitive sector on our way to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society , in the global export goods sector or primitive sector only, we would scale back the A.R State AE Eco Lib’s ‘free markets’ and temporarily switch to a Social Market/Social Credit for the global exports sector or the primitive sector only,  for our transition to an libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society until we were able to switch back to an A.R State AE Eco Lib ‘free markets’

With a temporary Social Market/Social Credit in this market path, in the global export goods sector or primitive sector , it would include free market capitalism alongside moderate economic intervention (and possilikely more) in order (at the very least when necessary) to ensure fair competition as we break out of the possible jam including with the government issuing debt free money directly to consumers or producers in the global export goods sector or primitive sector only on the condition that that they sell their product below cost to consumers) along with a moderate welfare state including pensions, health care, unemployment benefits, and maybe, a national dividend and or universal basic income (but only for the global export goods sector or primitive sector only)

Using this temporary safety net for the global export goods sector or primitive sector, it would still preserve staples of A.R State AE Eco Lib like private property,  free trade, unregulated prices etc. 

It would allow , in the global export goods sector or primitive sector only, temporary social control of credit and increase consumer's purchasing power and decentralize economic power. Money would act as a medium of communication by which consumers would temporarily direct the distribution of production. 

There would be more money and purchasing power for people .

Furthermore, this temporary safety net in this market path, in the global export goods sector or primitive sector it would reduce poverty and still allow economic freedom in this transition in this sect . 

But eventually we would we would need break free of this temporary safety net and go back to A.R State AE Eco Lib system in the global export goods sector or primitive sector

If the Market Path did not create income equality or lead us to our libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society, and we were now in a Capitalism in decay society it wouldn’t be as bleak as it appears. We would have basically done what Left acceleration does

Left acceleration is a system used to accelerate Capitalism to its absolute point and forcing our capitalist society to collapse causing a socialistic society to be able to be pursued easier and quicker. So our libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society would similarly be within reach even if the A.R State AE Eco Lib system with the labor theory of valued failed

If I wanted to use Left acceleration to get to our socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society by design without using it to do so by accident, here is what I would do. 

I would want our society to switch to a primarily meritocratic market-based system, with a combination of a balanced (cautionary and reform) and somewhat more limited equality of opportunity with a Merit based opportunity system. This is further good because I support empowering opportunity. Let’s call this method of  Left acceleration ‘Collectivist Populist fiscal paternalism’

In this ‘Collectivist Populist fiscal paternalism’ system, parents would be heavily encouraged or maybe even incentivized to raised their children like this this parent raised his child and to promote better education so the child has the best tools they need to get a fair chance (but a fairer chance than in a pure Merit Based Opportunity system since there would Equality of Opportunity, albeit a somewhat more limited version of it).     

This would also include a Equitability of Outcome based on the Fairness Model but also heavily encourage entitleds to counteract the Equitability (meaning if one worker goads the boss into everyone getting more pay but all being equal, then another worker who was the highest paid worker before this Fairness model Equitability of Opportunity was put in place then would ask for their own salary to be raised so they can be the highest worker again instead and so on) 

During economic downturns or recessions, the above system would have safety nets from forms of socially liberal neutered Socialism which are fairer, more just and more equal than other forms of Socialism , to give some security and dignity to people who fall onto hard times, regardless if they are most talented and abled workers in our society.

However in times of major economic inflations or depressions (like the Great Depression), the system would switch to just the Merit Based Opportunity System mentioned above along with implementing the Conservative Party UK’s Big Society as a stimulus safety net for laid off or fired workers etc (and maybe incentives for them to take lesser jobs during said inflations or depressions).

The The Big Society safety net would includes Big Society Bank, The Society Network Foundation, The Big Society school reform and Big Society Land

The Big Society Bank which would be funded by major US banks and dormant bank accounts under Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts. This would be used by the government to unlock charitable assets for big society. Up to one quarter of public service contracts would be transferred to private and voluntary sector in order to create a demand for the funds

The Society Network Foundation would be used “to generate, develop and showcase new ideas to help people to come together in their neighborhoods to do good things." It would be funded by the National Lottery funding and public sector grants.

The Big Society school reform would have free schools (otherwise known as charter schools) would make it possible for parents, teachers, charities and companies to set up and run their own schools.

Big Society Land would mean there would be community empowerment via new rights that are created for charitable trusts, voluntary bodies and others in order to apply to councils to carry out the services provided by the council. Such assets like shops, bars and recreational fields, which were privately owned but were of value to the community. If such an asset like that was later sold, the new rights above would make it easier for the community to bid for and take over the asset.

This safety net would also include something reminiscent of Social Democracy welfare safety net (i.e similar to the Nordic model moderate to strong welfare programs or something reminiscent to Social Democracy without adjectives strong welfare programs which for the latter may include something reminiscent of universal welfare and something reminiscent to Social Democracy progressive taxation [i.e taxation wealth re-distributing])

Equality of Opporutinity could be seen as violating liberty and property rights in that it contravenes the true meaning of the Declaration of Independance and subverts the principles of a free society. 

Equality of Opportunity can be seen as violating the boss's or owner's rights to hire the most effiicent workers and not be stymied by having to hire less efficent workers for EoO reasons.,  is a mirage, faslely assumes that merit based systems are competitions when they are not, and falsely assumes everyone has equal abilities. 

If we must build on our current system with a twist to make a more realistic socialistic society instead of my radical changes above then we need a fusion of our modern economical system, P Grudinism with a weird form of Trumpism with a touch of Peronism thrown into the mix by using Tripartism to do this  

This would mean that I would want a Tripartism of unions, Libertarian Middle Class Communist (a mix of Pavel Grudinism and an exaggerated form of our current economical system) employee organizations, and a psuedo Maoism (weird exaggerated form of Trumpism) government . There would be elements of Peronism in this Tripartism system   

The main theme of the psuedo Maoism government would be to work for the people by seemingly speaking for class struggle and to erase class lines so all former classes would be in harmony with each other and it would use a camouflaged command economy

It would duly select government workers and politicians based on its core values for promotion while any government workers and politicians modicum of power or self-respect are cut off at the knees 

Tripartism is sort of would be like an alliance between trade unions and the caudillos. This Tripartism system would be based off of cooperation, consultation, negotiation, and compromise with a bit of viewing issues through a black and white lense thrown into the mix . There would however be a distinction between the people (who would be united with the government) and forces opposed to the government 

Tripartism model in this hypothetical future system

The psuedo Maoism government angle to the Tripartism negotiations 

The government would unite with the proletariat resentment (including ordinary people/commoners like the rural masses and the core constituency of beleaguered working class/middle class i.e blue collar workers and voters) against economic distress, establishment, corruption, oligarchy , elitism and decendance which would make it easier and better for the government be able to use Tripartism to assume negotiation between conflicting interests to find and create unified and solid policies, for the people.  

During these Tripartism negotiations , the government would strongman at times but seek to do what is in all three sides’ economic interests due to the unique connections between these entities

The government would negotiate with employer organizations connected to banks on how they can use the national budget to use three quarters of that budget on socialist style entitlement programs 

The Libertarian Middle Class Communist  employer organizations angle to the Tripartism negotiations

The Libertarian Middle Class Communist platform would include these values which would play a part in their tripartisim negotiation strategy and goals:

The welfare of the people, not the rich people. 

The use of the US’s wealth, natural, industrial and financial resources for the service of the people.  

Credit resources which means the recovery of the economy by a decrease in Bank interest.

New industrialization, economical modernization and its output to innovation.

Withdrawal from the WTO. 

Equalization of opportunities of regional budgets. Gasification of the country.

Basic foods, commodities, housing prices having price controls

In the interests of justice and development, being pro progressive taxes 

Aboloshing the value added and transport tax, and the Platon system

Guaranteeing recovery for labor and the eight hour working day, providing work and a decent salary to people . Minimum salary of 25,000-30,000 rubles. 

Stopping the destruction of the social sphere

Free and qualitative secondary and higher education and health care. 

Fully supporting mothers and children. Equating the monthly child allowances to the subsistence level of the child. Increasing the payment of monthly benefits by a year and a half to three years. 

Citizens a decent pension. Adopting the law on "children of war". 

Maintaining the current age of retirement if that age is low 60s for men and upper 50s for women 

Indexation of pensions to working pensioners. Cancelling the reduction factor of 0.54 for military retirees. Establishing the average old-age pension – not less than fifty percent of the average wage. 

Protecting the spiritual health of the nation

Supporting massive construction of high-quality and affordable housing. Introducing the provision of flats or houses for young families, eliminating dilapidated housing. Declining mortgage rates to three/four percent.  For some children and young families, interest-free loan for up to thirty years. 

Curbing the greed of the moneylenders. Introducing criminal liability for involvement in a bonded transaction, prohibiting ocorrectors activities and assigning citizens’ debt obligations . 

Protecting nature.

Ensuring the defense capability and security of the country.

Restoring democracy and popular representation. Making the President accountable to the people and the House. Simplifying impeachment procedures.

The Libertarian Middle Class Communist employee organizations would be made up of mostly businessmen and businesswomen who would be representative of the bourgeois class

The Libertarian Middle Class Communist employee organizations would either have increased government subsidies or would besides regular employees, consist of at least 10 percent of government employees in private citizen, non government roles ,some of which would also buy shares and stakes in the newly Collectivized Federal Bank (Wall Street style refinancialization) which would be split up as collectivised federations

They collectively would negotiate with government for more added layers, less layers or different layers of rules, regulations, taxes, fees and registrations on capitalism 

They would also negotiate for lower or easier to pay costs to comply with this increased, less or different layering.

These Collectivized Federal Bank people would negotiate with the government for massive amounts of capital, in order for them to have the borrowing required to keep their bank socialism afloat (so they could run their bank like George Bailey did in It’s A Wonderful Life)  

Non bank employee organizations would also become collectivised federations and negotiate with the government to borrow more to pay more entitlements to induce people to buy more of their products . 

The government (who either via subsides or as private citizen shareholders or stakeholders in these employee organizations) would be interested in increased taxing and their unique connection to these employee organizations would make that easier for them to pull off, hence why they would like this model. The cycle would then repeat.

Select large American global corporations who empower the economy and have the biggest market presence would be nationalized to blur distinctions between corporations and government 

These nationalized global large American corporations (with the will of their corporated unions in mind) would through these employee organizations negotiate with the government for a economic market model of joining all nations in the same system, united by the same market, through these nationalized global large American corporations 

The unions angle in the Tripartism negotiations

The unions in these Tripartism negotiations would not be mouthpieces for the will and striving of the enlightened masses

The unions unions in these Tripartism negotiations would be more than just agents of the objective laws of the class movement.

These unions would be collectivised federations

Unions would be nudged by employer organizations and the government to be made corporate in exchange for union members throughout the US gaining the same perks that workers in Argentina had under Peronism 

Unions may use the threat of revolutionary (i.e anarcho-totalitarian methods and mobbing) worker’s movements like their worker ancestors did in the early 20th century in places like in Russia (October/Russian Revolution) and Spain (Popular Front) as a negotiation tactic with the government and employer organizations in these negotiations   

These unions would negotiate with the government and employer organizations to endure mandated equality in all areas of work life at job and away from work to remove workplace heiarchies and discrimination which would create a more productive , unified , socialistic and serene working environment for all workers making those jobs run like well oiled machines 

The unions and employer organizations would try to negotiate with thr government to “creates jobs” by writing rules. 

The unions would negotiate with the government and employer organizations for more legal protections  

Just think of this above Tripartism set up as a true Problem Solving Caucus but on steroids

Fiscal social

We need to equalize life chances so people can lead valuable lives even in our financially unequal society.

If you take the subprime lending of like the 1990s, but implement it in a mutualist -Marxist Leninist mixed economy that would be a decent system to implement

I support more affordable, quality housing

I am a Post Left Libertarian on housing laws and I would never vote on any homeowners related issue

I am ok with raising the minimum wage as long as the rich and middle class also has their average wages increased and or inflation goes along with that. Josh Hawley’s raising the minimum wage plan is practical and based

I support Welfare like the Welfare that is done in Egypt but I am ok with some forms of Bismarckinist welfare. 

I focus more on helping the enlightened masses of workers so that they aren’t left to themselves (ie where they aren’t all leaders without a leader movement) to foster a common goal and to help in their determination for a worker revolution than I do on expanding and or improving welfare. 

Welfare Chauvinism has good ideas but it is a bit too extreme and kind of bigoted so it is a frenemy

I am not a fan of Joe Biden’s strong welfare policies, based on my views in this blog, it would seem that I can at least live with those policies

I support London Living Wage

My view on Health Care, Universal Healthcare, Obamacare, Medicare for All are based on three or more of my socioeconomic views that I wrote in this blog. I can live with single payer health care fused with some far left elements added to it as long as it isn’t woke , otherwise NO

I support a incremental to moderate to shift to a NHS healthcare (with privitization) , in particular clinical commissioning  groups (but in a way that Bill Frist and Lisa Murkowski would approve) to replace our health care with some Thratchernomics amended Health and Social Care Act 2012 elements

My views on a Universal Basic Income are based on one or more of my fiscal views that I wrote above

I support a 2.35% rise in National Insurance over 5 years and a cap of 89,000 on lifetime costs in the UK

I support an amended Build Back Better that reflects my combined socioeconomic views in this blog but I can live with a Conservative Party UK amended Build Back Better

I am against student debt forgiveness. Young people already have their parents pay for their education. They have to learn how to live in the real world and student debt forgiveness is further pacification of them.  They are too entitled and need to learn how to live like adults. Paying their student loans back themselves is the best thing for them

I am ok with free schooling as long as homeschooling is promoted by the government connected lobby groups , NGOs and government workers as private citizens as a viable alternative (which it is)

I support property rights and privatization.However, I am an ally of anti-private property Libertarians so I am connected to their anti-private property views

I support the right to privacy

Fiscal institutions and currency

If I am too socialistic for you, here me out. In a truly Socialist society or Communist society, there are no need for social welfare, re-distributive taxation and regulatory measure. This is because in a Socialist society or Communist society, workers have greater control of the means of production and in the workplace, and eliminate exploitation by directing the surplus value to employees. 

In a Socialist society or Communist society , free access to the means of subsistence is a requisite for liberty because it ensures that all work is voluntary and no class or individual has the power to coerce others into performing alienating work. 

Socialists and Communists are also less race reduction than Social Democrats and Social Liberals, seeking to eliminate inequality through eliminating classes as opposed to diversifying the ‘oppressor and bourgeois’ classes. No classes no reductionism 

Socialists generally want to achieve greater equality in decision making and economic affairs, while granting workers greater control of the means of production and their workplace and to eliminate exploitation by directing the surplus value to employees.

While Social Democrats and Social Liberals aim to achieve greater economic stability and equality through policy measures such as taxes, subsidies, and social welfare programs, Market Socialists aim to achieve similar goals through changing patterns of enterprise ownership and management.

So if we want to get rid of the welfare state , taxes, and government regulation , we need to get rid of Capitalism. Because those things only can exist within a society with a Capitalist economy as unlike Socialism and Communism , those safety nets are needed for Capitalism. 

Socialism was ruined by the USSR and similar countries, if the USSR and those Socialist countries were run like Mikhail Gorb ran the USSR with his brand of Socialism (which is closer to real Socialism) there would never have been a red scare 

I am not an advocate of a command economy or a planned economy. I do support at least some (Paternalistic Conservative) regulation of the economy and conditionally a camouflaged command economy

I support the Silver Standard in a way that pleases pro Gold Standard people

I conditionally support flexible labor markets with laws that make it easy for employers to hire and shed workers or to introduce laborsaving technology on the condition that such government labor markets are designed to provide generous social welfare, job retraining and relocation services in order to limit any conflicts between capital and labor that might arise from this process. This would be to mitigate any negative effect on workers that such flexible labor markets caused

I am against the Great Reset

I want Amazon and Big Tech to be broken up, its time that they end their monopolies and gives people more options to choose from in terms of big tech. Plus Big tech is called Big Tech similar to Big Tobacco. Those 2 bigs were/are equally dangerous to many people who have no idea that those things were or are bad for them

CEOs shouldn’t have a booming salary while others’ pay is stagnant (but in a way that Lindsay Graham would agree with if he went left on this issue as far as he would allow himself to possible, and the Labour Party UK went right on this issue as far as they would allow themselves to and Graham and Labour Party UK met in middle on this issue. SSI can only go so far

Corporations owned and operated in the US should generally pay taxes in the US

Most small businesses are NOT tax cheats.Just because Justin Trudeau was a small business owner and has credibility to make those claims doesn't mean he is right. He is wrong

I believe that its better for corporations to voluntarily reform themselves than for them to be forced to do so. But the Great Reset's vision for corporations is evil and wrong. However, I do have a blue and orange morality and villain protaganist view of Corporatism and if the Great Reset is pro Corporatism, maybe I will extend that view to them but still be solidly against the Great Reset as I've always been

I feel it is good to use the Nordic Model as an asset against a angry Monarchy 

I support and encourage people to use war bonds, bonds and to save their money in savings accounts

I support people having off shore bank accounts, ecspecially with a anti bank President is running our country

I support Audit studies

I am against banks being penaltized for showing patterns of redlining (due to my Libertarian leanings)

The government should not increase the tax of people who profit from the sale of stocks ,bonds or real estate.

I am against President Biden's IRS bank snooping plan and his plan to unprivatize banks which is against our Constitution and our private rights

I support Austerity at times or in rare situations

I support stricter fraud and monetary policy laws (but flexible and compassionate)

I support tax cuts

I support the rich being taxed a lot for the betterment of society

I support lowering the income tax

I support free enterprise 

I am not a supporter of Joe Biden’s Protectionism

I truly support the working class

I support a reimagining of Labor Unions that addresses the concerns of the film Blue Collar (1978).  I am only a weak supporter of Labor Unions under our current capitalistic economy. Once we begin to truly transition to or become socialistic, I will be a Radical Cheerleader for labor unions

All jobs should be colorblind and should avoid identity politics

Antis

I am Anti Laissez Faire Capitalism, it would probably be easier to name the extremely rare forms of Capitalism I don’t hate than than the forms I am fine with or don’t hate.  I want eliminate the autonomy of large scale capitalism from the state. 

I am against Freemasonry

I strongly don’t support commercialism

I am against Cultural Marxism

I am against people having a sense of entitlement

I am Anti Woke Communism

I am opposed to Radicalism

I am against many corrupt forms and bourgeois variants of Mercantilism

I am against materialism and decadence. Materialism is and decadence are terrible things.

God says that the only wealth that matters is spiritual wealth and ethical wealth since those are the only materials we can take from this life to heaven. So materialism and decadence loses their luster when you think of that way. We need to individualize spiritual wealth.  See my Lifestyle blog post for more

Values

I am not Statist but I don’t believe my views show that I am Anti Statist. I do like Russia’s late 2000s and early 2010s Statism

I generally support economies having tight budgets where the government is very concerned with keeping debt low and running budget surpluses in limited/specific situations and my views throughout this blog reflect this value of mine

To me, New Libertarian (counter economics with a Libertarian conscious) economics is immediate self-liberation from statist controls, to whatever practical degree is practical, by applying entrepreneurial logic to logically decide which laws to discreetly break and when. 

We need to trade risk for profit, but profit would never refer to any gain in perceived value rather than strictly monetary gains (as a consequence of the subjective theory of value).

I believe economics should be tied to social issues, and that socioeconomics should come before politics

I am a Survivalist

I support hard work

I feel that having a good or better personality should be a core political value for people in the political realm (even if they have a cult of personality) and society in general and my views in this blog reflect this. Even a cult of personality 

I have a tender temperament and I am not given to extremes of emotion. 

I have a populist streak in me

I have a right to question authority as do all Americans

I support a balance between the Individual and the state in some NON US countries. I support Rugged Individualism for the US and most countries on Earth

I believe that political people (politicians, armchair pundits, pundits etc) should be smart, brave and articulate, all traits that I possess myself.

Personally I feel that it is reasonable for the tools of production to be kept private but production being for the betterment of society rather than personal gain

I feel that coercion is immoral, inefficient and unnecessary for human life and fulfillment

We need to fight back against people preying on their neighbors, they are free to prey on their neighbors and we are free fight back