repconviewsofme

2020 —  Dark Mutualism is essentially anti-humanist/anti-rights mutualism, I don't understand it very well but if you want to learn more you can ... anarchy is the perennial condition of the world. the idea of centralised, unified control is a pipe dream of monotheism, and has never been, nor could ever be, attained. 2. the fundamental vector of progress isn't a moral, but a technical arc, starting way before humanity came into play, and extending ahead into vast tracts of unknown unknowns. 3. what travels the path of such arc is intelligence, abstractly conceived as negentropy. all cosmic history is the history of intelligence optimization into an asymptote. 4. the motor of this movement is generalised Darwinian processes of variation and selection. it's only through this arms race dynamics that anything ever gets built and improved. biological life is just a subset of these processes. the obstacles in this arc are all variations of "peace" - entropic stagnation....

  Misc I am a mix of (and oscillate between being) a Christian Deist and an Antony Flew type of Deist I am opposed to punitive intellectual property rights laws (like with Fatal Fury wrongly being sued for bring too similar to Strret Fighter II), and the concept of intellectual property in general  in regards to the state as such things cause monopolies and distortion. The state should not be a foundation for any class of rightful property, but I am open to the idea of Media Created Property I want the TSA to be abolished and to move matters of airline security to private businesses. I am against Donald Trump's National Garden of American Heroes. The federal government and President have no right to tell us who are heroes should be and to shove those names down our throats.  Instead of the National Garden of American Heroes, Trump should have had all of the statues in the US that were removed or destroyed since the mid 2010s moved to (or rebuilt and erected if they were d...

Q) What does 'forth political position' or 'fifth political position' or '6th political position mean? A)  A forth, fifth or 6th political position is a political stance/position on issues that is neither support, against, neutral, liberal-progressive, conservative, centrist, indifferent, apolitical or 3rd political position but a hypothetical, political stance/political position that is as opposite of support and against as support and against are opposite of each other and is as opposite of liberal-progressive and conservative as liberal-progressive and conservative are opposite of each other.  Forth political position, fifth political position and 6th political position on political issues have never been seen before in our universe but those political stances/positions exists on political issues in other universes with different laws of nature than in our universe (just like there are primary colors that have never been seen in our universe but exist in other un...

As a kid I was apolitical about Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. In 1992 I supported Bill Clinton because George HW Bush sucked. In 1996 I endorsed Bob Dole for President, in 2000 I supported Bill Bradley and when he dropped out I supported George W Bush. I was apolitical to politics in the 1980s and 1990s. I became a Far left Democrat ‘Commie’ in 2003 due to me turning against the Iraq War and becoming anti war and me seeing the Dixie Chicks being bullied for being anti war by warhawks like Denis Leary etc. For the rest of the 2000s I was anti war (which I still am today but for the reasons Mark Twain was against war not for the Lenin reasons I was against war then), hated George W Bush and his neocon Republican allies, supported John Kerry and Barack Obama, had a lot of liberal views etc.   As a far left ‘Commie’ in the 2000s, whenever a pastor or a conservative commentator came on TV and said something that went against my liberal beliefs, I would go nuts and throw my remote at ...

 Blog navigation All of my views (unsorted) FAQ Animal rights Drugs and Crime issues Ethnicity and race issues Fiscal issues Gun Issues Identity politics/SJW International and Military etc issues LGBTQ+ issues Migration issues Misc issues Voting elections Science (ie Climate Change) issues Taboo issues Women's and Mens issues Youth and Disabled issues etc Hobby areas Polemic

elections I am against presidential autonomy Maybe if the fringe of the Democrats weren't so allegedly shady (ymmv) with elections there would be no need for voter reform like in Georgia and Texas I would support the John Lewis voting rights act under one condition: an amendment is added to that voting act to bring back (and legalize) poll taxes.  If it that can be added into the John Lewis voting rights act, I am fine with and support the John Lewis voting rights act I support the creation of a national photo id for Americans and the use of non strict, national photo id for voting (but no id requirement for registering to vote or mail in voting).   I'd also want the gov to make it much easier for poor people to get said national photo id than it is to get current types of ids If people can't provide that non strict, national photo id, if they can provide their voter registration card and state current name and residential address (and party affiliation in a primary elect...

 taboo I am against Polygamy, Polyarmy (except for maybe transgender people) and open marriages being legal. Monogamy is better than those systems as shown by science. Children suffer when they have parents who are Polygamous, Polyarmous or in open marriages. Polygamy et al cheapens love. If people in marriages want more they should get a divorce first. While I can see where the USA today was coming from with their article on pedophila, I am as against Pedophila as far right people are and want the same penalties for pedos.  Pedophila is evil and wrong and should always be illegal (though lowering age of consent by 1 or 2 years in each place where the age of consent is 18 or 17 along with allowing kids to be allowed to interact with non related ,non pedo adults the same way they did in the pre 1990s or pre 1970s world (like Dennis and Mr Wilson on Dennis the Menace) and assuming the parents did throughough background checks first, would be something I'd be open to considering....